Jazz Technical Services: Negotiations Update

Jazz Technical Services: Negotiations Update

September 25, 2012 at 12:00 PM

The bargaining committees for the company and union met as scheduled to participate in the Mediation Arbitration process that was previously agreed to by the parties.

Arbitrator Tom Hodges assisted the parties in an attempt to find a mutually agreeable resolution to this round of negotiations. The parties spent the day attempting to resolve the three outstanding issues. The CAW bargaining committee was clear that in order for us to reach a settlement that we would recommend to our members for ratification, the company must remove the ten-hour shifts for twenty members in Toronto, enhance the economic package and resolve the shift issues for the heavy bases.

The employer’s position was that the issues in dispute were the subject of negotiations and that there was a quid pro quo on how we reached the current tentative agreement. The company’s position was clear that they abandoned several of their issues in order to reach the current tentative agreement.

As the day progressed the company was clear that any changes to the current agreement would have to be paid for with the loss of economic gains contained in the tentative agreement including - but not limited to - a fourth year in the agreement.

We as a committee were unanimous that we were not going to trade off our hard fought gains. We however made numerous attempts to reach a settlement. However we were not successful.

We did resolve the issue of the shifts in the heavy bases. The employer will now implement the shift schedules at the heavy bases for the 2013, 2014 shift bid as per the amended tentative agreement and discussions held today. This means that there will not be eight-hour shifts for the life of the agreement, unless mutually agreed to by the union and the company and the 4/5/5 is locked in for two years.

Regarding the union’s proposal to enhance the economic package Arbitrator Tom Hodges will address this issue in his award.

The ten hour shift issue in Toronto was the area where the employer was most aggressive. This issue was not resolved by the parties, however due to the timing and the extent of the issues involved the Arbitrator has issued an oral award preventing the company from implementing the ten-hour shifts for the 2013 shift bid. The Arbitrator’s award will specify what provisions will be included in the contract going forward regarding this issue.

We understand there is some debate among the membership on the merits of this process. As a result of the efforts of your bargaining committee and through discussions with the employer the Arbitrator has issued an oral award that the tentative agreement as amended should be instituted and he will cover the outstanding issues in his award. In essence there is now a severe limitation on the potential adverse effects to be contained in the arbitrators ruling.

This communication is meant to inform you of the process and some of our discussions. If you have further questions, please direct them to your local bargaining committee member. We are in the process of planning meetings at every base in order to clarify the amendments to the collective agreement we were successful in negotiating on September 13 and 14. In addition, we will clarity the amendments we were successful in achieving on September 24.